TESTIRANJE NA ŽIVALIH

[SunnyDay]

Kupila sem šampom od Ma provence, v trdi obliki, ker naj bi bilo iz naravnih sestavin, ne testirano na živalih.

Ima certifikat Cosmetique Bio Charte Cosmebio.

Obstaja kakšno čimmanj škodljivo, na živalih netestirano čistilo / loščilo za les.

Imam Sonettovo iz DM, ima Eco Garantie.

[miskica]

Za parket je tako kot za skoraj vse ostalo uporaben tudi preprosto kis . Če se šipe svetijo, zakaj se ne bi še tla .

Ker je na parketu lak (dandanes na vodni osnovi), ki ga kisle snovi počasi požirajo.

[SunnyDay]

Bosch pravi, da ne:
Does bosch do tests on animals when developping products?
No. Our standpoint on animal testing is clearly defined by our quality management handbook:

The developping of new products is based on projects which rest on a scientifically researched and recognised foundation. We are strictly against any kind of animal testing which majorly affects the life of animals or which is associated with any kind of pain or suffering. Therefore we judge all animal testings associated with torture and pain that recently became public news and in which sadly pet food companies had been involved also.
In our opinion, the tests, pain and suffering is in most cases in no relation to the results and consequences for which purpose the tests are taking place. Sometimes there is even an impression that tests are misused as a cover to promote marketing statements.

Of course, our products have to be "evaluated" through animals, in order to see the influence of e.g. new raw materials or a new manufacturing process on the quality of our products. Dogs and cats are living creatures, and reactions cannot be foretold. Therefore, when developping new products, there might be an acceptance test which only proves the acceptance and digestability of the food. The manners of intaking food, stool consistancy, fur quality and, if applicable, the over all development and condition of the animals is monitored by the pet owner. Those acceptance tests take place in either private house holds or in proper kennels and are administered exclusively by the owner himself. Since it's in the best interest of the pet owner to keep inconveniences from his pet, the acceptance tests we use have nothing in common with animal testing.

(Vir)

[SunnyDay]

Mogoče bi bilo uporabno tole:
http://www.uncaged.co.uk/petfood.htm
http://www.fortunecity.com/greenfield/hummingbird/198/id2.htm

V bistvu so od super premium kakovosti s seznama na 2. linku v nebo vpijoči od P&G (tako kot pri kozmetiki) - Eukanuba/Iams, pa Hill's in Royal Canin ...

[SunnyDay]

To zgoraj tudi piše pri Boschu. Se pa ne more primerjat z laboratorijskim testiranjem na živalih v kletkah.

[luna7]

Sem preverila na netu in mislim, da bo boschev.... 

[Lanabela]

SunnyDay: Se strinjam. Je pa vseeno testiranje. In lastne laboratorije si lahko privošči le zelo malo proizvajalcev pasje hrane. Imajo jih predvsem tisti, ki jih rabijo tudi za kakšne druge, precej manj živalim prijazne teste (pri pasjih hranah niso potrebni nobeni grobi testi več, ker je že dovolj podatkov od prej).